$title = 'The advantage of videoconference equipment in the legal system'; $meta_keywords = 'videoconference, video conferencing, telepresence, video conferencing equipment.'; $meta_description = 'Video conferencing equipment installed in the courts has revolutionized the legal system. Today there are some courts where cases do not need to travel to other courts.'; include_once('../static_header.html'); ?>
In the legal system cost is a major factor. One of the most important uses of videoconferencing is the reduction in costs for all involved. Through videoconferencing attorneys and legal aides, who are often paid by the hour, can make much better use of their time in research and interviews. With videoconferencing there is no longer a need for long distance travel.
This links back to the value of expediency in the legal system and the use of videoconferencing accelerates the processing of cases while it reduces time consuming and cost demanding practices such as transporting prisoners from the jail to the courthouse, sometimes more than once a day.
As noted, agencies incur heavy expenses when providing security and supervision for inmates who are being transported from jail to the courthouse and then back to jail. Such expense becomes clearer when the true factors of the expense are shown. Actual costs associated with the transportation of inmates include costs of hiring a bus driver, operating a bus, gas and long term maintenance of the vehicle itself.
Video arraignment via videoconferencing remains one of the most cost effective uses of the technology. Not only are the transportation and security costs of the usual arraignment procedures dismissed by a videoconference, unnecessary paperwork is eliminated. In the usual arraignment procedure where a prisoner was transferred to court proceedings, sheriff, police and corrections personnel just to process the necessary paperwork spent hours. In addition, all this is simply from the jail perspective.
From the courthouse perspective, the common in person arraignment often causes serious overcrowding of courthouse holding facilities for while a defendant is at the courthouse his actual in court time may be limited yet he or she must remain available to the court and on premises until they are needed. This is no longer necessary with videoconferencing.
The value of this becomes paramount when there is an increased volume in criminal court cases. The holding capacity of many courthouse facilities is becoming increasingly insufficient to meet current demand. The result is an overcrowded, uncomfortable, and potentially dangerous situation. Plus, the fact that transporting individuals can create a delay for the entire court, including the judge, bailiff, public defender, district attorney and anyone else relative to that one particular arraignment. Meanwhile the court docket shows another arraignment waiting.
This is time lost. The use of videoconferencing increases courtroom efficiency and makes for better management of the docket and regardless of jurisdiction size or arraignment caseload, public safety agencies, departments of corrections, and courts throughout the country can benefit from videoconferencing.
For now, although every courthouse is not equipped with a videoconferencing system at this time, it is easy to see in the near future the use of videoconferencing for everything from judge meetings and bond hearings to settlement conferences and child support hearings, all of which reduces the cost to citizens and taxpayers. In the long run there will be more use of videoconferencing in the legal system providing an increased efficiency for all.